« Prince Charles to appear in bro'Town | Main | Scoble: what price profit? »

June 08, 2005

News the New Zealand way

TVNZ is refreshingly free of the BBC's cult of sober pseudo-impartiality, and nobody indulges it more than their London correspondent, Gordon Harcourt. During the UK election, his objective assessment was, "The Tories are toast." Tonight his report on the Blair-Bush summit mentioned a number of African governments, good, bad and "Bob Mugabe waving a flag for the Insane Despots Brigade."

Their breakfast magazine programme mounted a month-long campaign of sniping against Hamilton, the most rural of NZ's big centres and a notorious backwater. This eventually reached a point where the producers had to schedule a slot with three prominent Hamiltonians to get their own back on the presenter at the head of all this mischief. The resulting interview was priceless, especially the revelation from the punk rock member of the panel that Hamilton has the biggest porn industry in NZ. Just what the kiddies want to hear over their cornflakes.

Oh, and TVNZ's satire series, Face Lift, is a kind of live action Spitting Image. Yes, live action. The unholy combination of human actors and latex caricature is not something you want to come upon without warning. But, by Jove, they've got Winston "Hammer of the Iraqis" Peters nailed...

June 8, 2005 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5c9b53ef00d83482a97e69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference News the New Zealand way:

Comments

Actually the London correspondent is Lisa Owen, and Gordon is the hanger on - boyfriend.

Also the breakfast tv here is rubbish - I miss Natasha Kaplinsky, in a way that even I find a little disturbing.

Posted by: liveincourtenay at Jun 9, 2005 9:40:04 AM

Blimey Sam, you're everywhere.

In response to the actual post: are you suggesting that impartiality is a bad thing?

Posted by: Alasdair at Jun 13, 2005 11:52:56 AM

No, I'm not suggesting that impartiality is a bad thing. But over-cautious, over-polite, excessively-balanced reporting is (a) very boring after a while and (b) often less credible than reporting which admits the obvious, because either it insults the intelligence (anybody who could say "The Tories say they still have a good chance of winning the election" without falling around laughing is either stupid or thinks I'm stupid), or revolts the senses (e.g. trying to be "impartial" when reporting man-made disasters such as the Sudanese famine or murder/torture regimes such as Uzbekistan or Zimbabwe).

Hmm, that got rather more serious than my intended point. Which is that it's fun when the TV news puts the boot into Michael Howard. It at least passes the time between copies of "Private Eye."

Posted by: Ivan Towlson at Jun 13, 2005 12:53:07 PM